Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorOTALORA MOSQUERA, CATHERINE
dc.contributor.authorVÁSQUEZ BARRERA, CRISTIAN CAMILO
dc.coverage.spatialCOLOMBIA
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-31T16:03:07Z
dc.date.available2023-01-31T16:03:07Z
dc.date.issued2022-10-25
dc.identifier.citationVasquez, C. (2023) Requisitos de un modelo de toma de decisiones aeronáuticas para la Fuerza Aérea Colombiana. Bogotá: Escuela de Posgrados de la Fuerza Aérea Colombiana.es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12963/927
dc.description.abstractLa Toma de Decisiones Aeronáuticas (TDA) es el proceso mental a través del cual los pilotos gestionan las situaciones inesperadas del vuelo mediante la identificación y ejecución del curso de acción que mejor se ajuste al cumplimiento de los objetivos propuestos. A pesar de que cerca del 55% de los accidentes aéreos están relacionados con errores de decisión, la Fuerza Aérea Colombiana (FAC) no ha implementado aún un modelo oficial de entrenamiento en TDA para sus pilotos. Por tal motivo, el presente estudio se propuso, mediante un enfoque cualitativo, exploratorio y descriptivo, establecer los requisitos que debería reunir dicho modelo. Para lo anterior se caracterizaron los modelos existentes de TDA, se realizó un análisis causal de los accidentes por factor humano en la FAC entre los años 2008 y 2020 y se diagnosticó, mediante una encuesta, el proceso actual de TDA de los pilotos de la FAC. A partir de lo anterior, se logró identificar que existe un desconocimiento generalizado por parte de los pilotos de la FAC sobre las bases teóricas y los modelos existentes de TDA, por lo que es necesario que el modelo a implementar sea incorporado en los programas de entrenamiento de vuelo a todos los niveles. Asimismo, se requiere que el modelo se enfoque en mitigar los efectos de actitudes negativas como la complacencia y el sentimiento de invulnerabilidad, y enfatice el mantenimiento de la consciencia situacional, así como la etapa específica de selección del curso de acción a partir de evaluación y gestión del riesgo, para lo cual el modelo FOR-DEC ofrece las mejores herramientas.es_ES
dc.format.extent167 páginas
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.language.isospaes_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.titleRequisitos de un modelo de toma de decisiones aeronáuticas para la Fuerza Aérea Colombianaes_ES
dcterms.referencesAmalberti, R. (2002). Revisiting Safety and Human Factors Paradigms to Meet the Safety Challenges of Ultra-Complex and Safe Systems. In B. Willpert and B. Falhbruch (Eds.), System Safety: Challenges and Pitfalls of Interventions (pp. 265-276). Amsterdam, Pays-Bas: Elsevieres_ES
dcterms.referencesBenner, L. (1975). DECIDE in hazardous materials emergencies. Fire Journal, 69, 13–18. Recuperado de: http://www.henrycoema.org/EMA/HazMat_Training_Materials_files/DECIDE.pdfes_ES
dcterms.referencesBueno, R., A. (2015) Análisis de fallas en el proceso de selección de pilotos para primeras autonomías de ala fija en la Fuerza Aérea. Bogotá- Colombia: Colección Ciencia y Poder Aéreo No. 9. Cap. 1. Pp. 20-45. ISBN: 978-958-99406-6-2. Recuperado de: https://libros.publicacionesfac.com/index.php/libros/catalog/view/5/4/75-1es_ES
dcterms.referencesByrnes, K. (2015) Measuring the Effect of Safety Culture and Climate on Aeronautical Decision Making. Dissertation Manuscript. Prescott Valley, Arizona: Northcentral University, School of Business and Technology Management. UMI Number: 3687910.es_ES
dcterms.referencesCampbell, S. (2015) Safety Culture: An Examination of the Effects of a Safety Management System on Pilot Aeronautical Decision-Making Skills. Dissertation Manuscript. Prescott Valley, Arizona: Northcentral University, School of Business and Technology Management. ProQuest Number: 3733860.es_ES
dcterms.referencesCivil Aviation Authority Australia CAAA (2013). Human Factors Resource Guide for Engineers. Retrieved from https://www.casa.gov.au/sites/g/files/net351/f/_assets/main/lib100215/hf-engineers-res.pdfes_ES
dcterms.referencesCook, G. N. (1995). Cockpit Resource Management Training: Are Current Instructional Methods Likely to be Successful?. Journal of Aviation/Aerospace Education & Research, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.15394/jaaer.1995.1145es_ES
dcterms.referencesDiehl, A., Hwoschinsky, P., Livack, G. y Lawton, R. (1987) Aeronautical Decision Making for student and private pilots. US Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration. Arlington, VA, EE.UU: Systems Control Technology, Inc. Report No. DOT/FAA/PM-86/41. Recuperado de: http://www.tc.faa.gov/its/worldpac/techrpt/pm86-41.pdfes_ES
dcterms.referencesEASA – European Union Aviation Safety Agency (2020) Easy Access Rules for Aircrew (Regulation (EU) No 1178/2011) Recuperado de: https://www.easa.europa.eu/document-library/easy-access-rules/easy-access-rules-aircrew-regulation-eu-no-11782011es_ES
dcterms.referencesElgin, P.D.; Thomas, R.P. (2004). An Integrated Decision-Making Model for Categorizing Weather Products and Decision Aids. NASA/TM-2004-212990es_ES
dcterms.referencesEstrada, E. (2018) Líneas de Investigación Maestría en Seguridad Operacional. Escuela de Posgrados de la Fuerza Aérea Colombianaes_ES
dcterms.referencesFAA – Federal Aviation Administration (1989) Aeronautical Decision Making – Cockpit Resource Management. U.S. Department of Transportation. Report No. DOT/FAA/PM-86/46. Recuperado de: https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a205115.pdfes_ES
dcterms.referencesFAA - Federal Aviation Administration (1991). Advisory Circular 60-22: Aeronautical Decision Making. Recuperado de: https://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/Advisory_Circular/AC_60-22.pdfes_ES
dcterms.referencesFAA - Federal Aviation Administration (2016). Pilot Handbook of Aeronautical Knowledge. Recuperado de https://www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/handbooks_manuals/aviation/phak/es_ES
dcterms.referencesFAA – Federal Aviation Administration (2020) 14 CFR Part 61 – Certification: Pilots, Flight Instructors, and Ground Instructors. Electronic Code of Federal Regulations Title 14 - Aeronautics and Space. Recuperado el 1 de noviembre de 2020 de: https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=b65b15e09fde2929bb49433951cafac7&mc=true&node=pt14.2.61&rgn=div5es_ES
dcterms.referencesFAC – Fuerza Aérea Colombiana (2013) Manual de Doctrina Básica Aérea y Espacial - MADBA, 4ta Ed, FAC O-E Público.es_ES
dcterms.referencesFlight Copilot (2011) DODAR – A breakdown. Recuperado de: https://www.flightcopilot.com/post/2017/12/11/dodar-a-breakdownes_ES
dcterms.referencesFlightdeckfriend.com (n.d.) How do commercial airline pilots make decisions? A look at the decision-making process on the flight deck. Recuperado de: https://www.flightdeckfriend.com/ask-a-captain/how-do-pilots-make-decisions-2/es_ES
dcterms.referencesGolgowiski, N. (2014) Odds of dying in plane crash in U.S. are equal to being struck by lightning SEVEN times: expert. New York Daily News, Ed. 24 de Julio de 2014. Recuperado el 5 de septiembre de 2020 de https://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/common-plane-crashes-expert-weighs-deadly-week-article-1.1879212es_ES
dcterms.referencesHammond, K. R., Hamm, R. M., Grassia, J., & Pearson, T. (1987). Direct comparison of the efficacy of intuitive and analytical cognition in expert judgment. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC-1 7(5), 753-770.es_ES
dcterms.referencesHarris, Donald and Li, Wen-Chin. (2006). The Evaluation of the Decision-Making Processes Employed by Cadet Pilots Following a Short Aeronautical Decision-Making Training Program. International Journal of Applied Aviation Studies. 6. 315-333.es_ES
dcterms.referencesHarris, D., and Wen-Chin Li (2015) Decision Making in Aviation. New York: Routledge. ISBN 9780754628675es_ES
dcterms.referencesHaslbeck, A., Eichinger, A., & Bengler, K. (2013) Pilot Decision Making: Modeling Choices in Go-Around Situations. Conference Paper, Institute of Ergonomics, Technische Universität München. Recuperado de: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/264894601_Pilot_Decision_Making_Modeling_Choices_in_Go-Around_Situationses_ES
dcterms.referencesHancock,P.A., Desmond, P.A., 2001. Stress, workload and fatigue. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.es_ES
dcterms.referencesHelmreich, R. L., Wilhelm, J. A, Gregorich, S. E., & Chidester, T. R. (1990). Preliminary results from the evaluation of cockpit resource management training: Performance ratings of flightcrews. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 61, 576-579.es_ES
dcterms.referencesHelmreich, R.L., Merritt, A.C., & Wilhelm, J.A. (1999). The evolution of Crew Resource Management training in commercial aviation. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 9(1), 19-32. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327108ijap0901_2es_ES
dcterms.referencesHenning S., Solveig P., Gesine H., y Gunnar S (2016) Decision-Making Tools for Aeronautical Teams: FOR-DEC and Beyond. Aviation Psychology and Applied Human Factors (2016), 6(2), 101–112. DOI: 10.1027/2192-0923/a000099es_ES
dcterms.referencesHernández-Sampieri, R. & Mendoza, C (2010). Metodología de la investigación. Las rutas cuantitativa, cualitativa y mixta, Ciudad de México, México: Editorial Mc Graw Hill Education, Año de edición: 2010, ISBN: 978-1-4562-6096-5, 714 p.es_ES
dcterms.referencesHernández, R., Fernández, C., & Baptista, P. (2016). Metodología de la investigación. 6ta Edición Sampieri. Soriano, RR (1991). Guía para realizar investigaciones sociales. Plaza y Valdés. ISBN: 978-1-4562-2396-0es_ES
dcterms.referencesHernández-Sampieri, R., & Mendoza, C. P. (2018). Metodologìa de la Investigaciòn. Las rutas Cuantitativa Cualitativa y Mixta. Ciudad de México, México: Editorial Mc Graw Hill Education, Año de edición: 2018, ISBN: 978-1-4562-6096-5es_ES
dcterms.referencesHockey, G.R.L., 1979. Stress and the cognitive components of skilled performance. In: Hamilton, V., Warbuton, D.M. (Eds.), Human Stress and Cognition: An Information-processing Approach. Wiley, Chichester.es_ES
dcterms.referencesHörmann, H. J. (1995). FOR-DEC. A prescriptive model for aeronautical decision-making. In R. Fuller, N. Johnston, & N. McDonald (Eds.), Human factors in aviation operations. Proceedings of the 21st Conference of the European Association for Aviation Psychology (EAAP) (Vol. 3, pp. 17–23). Aldershot, UK: Avebury Aviation.es_ES
dcterms.referencesIVAO – International Virtual Aviation Organisation (2020) DODAR. Recuperado de: https://mediawiki.ivao.aero/index.php?title=DODAR#Referencees_ES
dcterms.referencesKeyes, R. Maj. USAF (1990) Cockpit Resource Management A New Approach to Aircrew Coordination Training. Air University CADRE, Maxwell AFB. Airpower Research Institute. Report number AU-ARI-89-12es_ES
dcterms.referencesKlein, G. (1993). Decision Making in Action: Models and Methods. Norwood, NJ, United States: Ablex Publishing Corporation. ISBN: 0-89391-794-Xes_ES
dcterms.referencesKlein, G. (1997). The recognition-primed decision (RPD) model: Looking back, looking forward. In C. E. Zsambok & G. Klein (Eds.), Expertise: Research and applications. Naturalistic decision making (p. 285–292). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.es_ES
dcterms.referencesLi, WC., Li, LW., Harris, D., y Yueh-Ling, H. (2014) The application of aeronautical decision-making support systems for improving pilots’ performance in flight operations. Journal of Aeronautics, Astronautics and Aviation, Vol.46, No.2 pp.114 - 123 (2014) 114 DOI:10.6125/14-0324-789es_ES
dcterms.referencesLi, W. C., & Harris, D. (2005) Aeronautical decision making: Instructor-pilot evaluation of five Mnemonic methods. Aviation Space and Environmental Medicine, Vol. 76, No. 12. ISSN: 00956562; PMID: 16370266es_ES
dcterms.referencesMarshall, D. (2010). Crew Resource Management: From patient safety to high reliability. Denver, CO: Safer Healthcare Partners. ISBN 10: 0984385126, ISBN 13: 9780984385126es_ES
dcterms.referencesMartinussen, M., & Hunter, D. R (2018) Aviation Psychology and Human Factors. 2nd Ed. Boca Ratón: Taylor & Francis Group. ISBN: 978-1-4987-5752-2es_ES
dcterms.referencesMcKinney E. H., Jr (1993). Flight leads and crisis decision-making. Aviation, space, and environmental medicine, 64(5), 359–362es_ES
dcterms.referencesMuñoz, M., D. (2018) Human Factors in Aviation: CRM (Crew Resource Management). Psychologist Papers, 2018. Vol. 39(3), pp. 191-199. https://doi.org/10.23923/pap.psicol2018.2870es_ES
dcterms.referencesMurray, S. R. (1997). Deliberate decision making by aircraft pilots: A simple reminder to avoid decision making under panic. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 7(1), 83–100. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327108ijap0701_5es_ES
dcterms.referencesNaturalistic Decision Making (NDM) Conference website (n.d.) Extraido el 31 de Julio de 2020 de: https://naturalisticdecisionmaking.org/es_ES
dcterms.referencesNovak, A., & Mrazova, M. (2015). The effect of physiological stressors on pilot’s decision making during unfavourable simulated conditions: An explorative study. INCAS Bulletin, 7(2), 153–162. DOI: 10.13111/2066-8201.2015.7.2.16es_ES
dcterms.referencesNTSB - National Transportation Safety Board. (2016). Aviation Accident Database & Synopses. Retrieved from Aviation Accident Reports: http://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/AccidentReports/Pages/aviation.aspxes_ES
dcterms.referencesNTSB - National Transportation Safety Board. (1973 a) Aircraft Accident Report, File No. 1-0016. Washington, D.C. Eastern Air Lines Inc. L.1011, N310EA, Miami, Florida, December 29, 1972. Report Number NTSB-AAR-73-14. Recuperado el 5 de septiembre de 2020 de https://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/AccidentReports/Reports/AAR7314.pdfes_ES
dcterms.referencesNTSB - National Transportation Safety Board. (1973 b) Aircraft Accident Report, File No. 1-0048. Washington, D.C. United Airlines Inc. Boeing 737, N9031U, Chicago-Midway Airport, December 8, 1972. Report Number NTSB-AAR-73-16. Recuperado el 5 de septiembre de 2020 de http://libraryonline.erau.edu/online-full-text/ntsb/aircraft-accident-reports/AAR73-16.pdfes_ES
dcterms.referencesNTSB - National Transportation Safety Board. (1979) Aircraft Accident Report. Washington, D.C. United Airlines Inc. McDonnell-Douglas, DC-8-61, N8082U, Portland, Oregon, December 28, 1978. Report Number NTSB-AAR-79-7. Recuperado el 5 de septiembre de 2020 de https://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/AccidentReports/Reports/AAR7907.pdfes_ES
dcterms.referencesOldaker, L. (1995). Pilot decision-making – an alternative to judgment training. XXIV Organisation Scientific et Technique International du Vol a Voile (OSTIV) Congress, Omanara, New Zealand. Recuperado de: https://journals.sfu.ca/ts/index.php/ts/article/view/535es_ES
dcterms.referencesOACI - Organización de la Aviación Civil Internacional (2013). Manual of Evidence-Based Training. Documento 9995, Primera Edición, AN/497. ISBN 978-92-9249-242-7es_ES
dcterms.referencesOACI - Organización de la Aviación Civil Internacional (2016). Circular number 216-AN/131. Retrieved from http://www.icao.int/NACC/Pages/edocs-fs.aspxes_ES
dcterms.referencesOACI - Organización de la Aviación Civil Internacional (2016). Doc 9995 AN/497 Manual of evidence-based training. Montréal, Quebec, Canada. ISBN 978-92-9249-242-7es_ES
dcterms.referencesOrasanu, J. (2010). Flight Crew Decision- Making. Crew Resource Management, Edition: Second, Chapter: 5, Publisher: Academic Press, Editors: B. Kanki, R. Helmreich, J. Anca, pp.32. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-374946-8.10005-6.es_ES
dcterms.referencesPlant, K (2015) Investigations into aeronautical decision making using the Perceptual Cycle Model. Recuperado de: https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/388089/1/KatherinePlant_PhDThesis_FINAL.pdfes_ES
dcterms.referencesPrince, C., & Salas, E. (1993). Training and research for teamwork in the military aircrew. In E. L. Wiener, B. G. Kanki, & R. L. Helmreich (Eds.), Cockpit resource management (p. 337–366). Academic Press.es_ES
dcterms.referencesRasmussen, J. (1983) Skills, rules, and knowledge; signals, signs, and symbols, and other distinctions in human performance models, in IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, vol. SMC-13, no. 3, pp. 257-266, doi: 10.1109/TSMC.1983.6313160.es_ES
dcterms.referencesReason, J. (1990) Human Error. New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 0521314194.es_ES
dcterms.referencesRocha, R. y Lima., F. (2018) Human errors in emergency situations: cognitive analysis of the behavior of the pilots in the Air France 447 flight disaster. Artículo en Gestão & Produção vol.25 no.3. ISSN 0104-530X (versión impresa), ISSN 1806-9649 (versión digital); Recuperado de: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0104-530x1115-17.es_ES
dcterms.referencesSalas, E., & Maurino, D. (2009). Human Factors in Aviation (2nd Edition). Burlington, MA, USA: Academic Press. ISBN: 9780123745187es_ES
dcterms.referencesSalas, E., Bowers, C. A., & Edens, E. (Eds.). (2001). Improving teamwork in organizations: Applications of resource management training. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. Boca Raton: CRC Press, https://doi.org/10.1201/b12465. ISBN: 9780429228179es_ES
dcterms.referencesShappell, S., & Wiegmann (2000) The Human Factors Analysis and Classifification System—HFACS. FAA Civil Aeromedical Institute, Oklahoma City, OK 73125. Report No. DOT/FAA/AM-00/7. Recuperado de: https://commons.erau.edu/publication/737es_ES
dcterms.referencesShappell, S., Wiegmann, & Douglas, A. (2012). Human Error Approach to Aviation Accident Analysis. Abingdon, GB: Ashgate. Abingdon, GB: Ashgate. Retrieved from http://site.ebrary.com.ezproxy.libproxy.db.erau.edu/lib/erau/detail.action?docID=10211330es_ES
dcterms.referencesSkybrary (n.d.) Decision-Making Training (OGHFA BN). Extraído el 21de julio de 2020 de: https://www.skybrary.aero/index.php/Decision-Making_Training_(OGHFA_BN)es_ES
dcterms.referencesThell, D. (2016) Training Aeronautical Decision Making in Commercial Flight Operations. Lund University, School of Aviation. Recuperado de: https://lunduniversityo365-my.sharepoint.com/personal/tfhs-nda_lu_se/Documents/es_ES
dcterms.referencesTsang, P. S., & Vidulich, M. A. (Eds.). (2002). Principles and practice of aviation psychology. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlmaum Associates, Publishers. ISBN: 0-8058-3390-0es_ES
dcterms.referencesUAEAC – Unidad Administrativa Especial de la Aeronáutica Civil (2019) RAC 61 – Licencias para los Pilotos y sus Habilitaciones. Oficina de Transporte Aéreo - Grupo de Normas Aeronáuticas. Recuperado de: http://www.aerocivil.gov.co/autoridad-de-la-aviacion-civil/reglamentacion/races_ES
dcterms.referencesWen-Chin Li (2011) The Casual Factors of Aviation Accidents Related to Decision Errors in the Cockpit by System Approach. Journal of Aeronautics, Astronautics and Aviation, Series A, Vol.43, No.3 pp.159 - 166 (2011) Retrieved on April 30th, 2020 from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/271132590_The_casual_factors_of_aviation_accidents_related_to_decision_errors_in_the_cockpit_by_system_approaches_ES
dcterms.referencesWickens, C.D., Stokes, A., Barnett, B., Hyman, F., 1993. The effects of stress on pilot judgment in a MIDIS simulator. In: Svenson, O., Maule, A.J. (Eds.), Time Pressure and Stress in Human Judgment and Decision Making. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 271–292.es_ES
dcterms.referencesWise, J. A., Hopkin, V. D., & Garland, D. J. (Eds.). (2009). Handbook of aviation human factors, Segunda Edición. Taylor & Francis Group. Boca Raton, FL (EE.UU.) ISBN: 978-1-4200-6357-8es_ES
dcterms.referencesWohl, J. G. (1981) Force Management Decision Requirements for Air Force Tactical Command and Control, in IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, vol. 11, no. 9, pp. 618-639, Sept. 1981, doi: 10.1109/TSMC.1981.4308760.es_ES
dcterms.referencesZsambok C. y Klein G (1997) Naturalistic Decision Making. Philadelphia, United States: Taylor and Francis Group. ISBN-13: 978-0805818741, ISBN-10: 080581874Xes_ES
dc.audienceEstudiantes, investigadoreses_ES
dc.contributor.directorESTRADA VILLA, ERIKA JULIANA
dc.identifier.instnameEscuela de Postgrados de la Fuerza Aérea Colombianaes_ES
dc.identifier.reponameRepositorio EPFACes_ES
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rights.ccAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.subject.keywordsToma de decisiones aeronáuticases_ES
dc.subject.keywordsError de decisiónes_ES
dc.subject.keywordsFuerza Aérea Colombianaes_ES
dc.subject.keywordsFactor humanoes_ES
dc.subject.keywordsAviaciónes_ES
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesises_ES
dc.type.hasversioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/draftes_ES
dc.type.spaTesis de maestríaes_ES
datacite.rightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2es_ES
oaire.resourcetypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcces_ES
oaire.versionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_b1a7d7d4d402bccees_ES
thesis.degree.disciplineMaestría en Seguridad Operacionales_ES
thesis.degree.grantorEscuela de Postgrados de la Fuerza Aérea Colombianaes_ES
thesis.degree.levelTesis maestríaes_ES
thesis.degree.nameMaestría en Seguridad Operacionales_ES


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/