Show simple item record

Gestión de conocimiento, ¿necesidad o valor agregado?;
Gerenciamento de conhecimento, necessidade ou valor agregado?

dc.creatorMuñoz Peña, Fernando Andrés
dc.date2017-12-06
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-17T12:59:38Z
dc.date.available2021-06-17T12:59:38Z
dc.identifierhttps://publicacionesfac.com/index.php/cienciaypoderaereo/article/view/578
dc.identifier10.18667/cienciaypoderaereo.578
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12963/266
dc.descriptionIn their constant quest for competitive advantage –and in consequence, of their sustainability, organizations should ensure continuous improvement in all their processes, concepts, tools and models to be faster than their competitors. One of these tools is Knowledge Management (KM), which is basically defined as those processes that aim to assess the intangible assets of an organization and help their search for continuous improvement. This review article discusses the different approaches taken by various authors around the theme of KM regarding conceptual and characterization aspects, as well as more elaborate proposals for model implementation.eng
dc.descriptionLas organizaciones en su constante búsqueda de la ventaja competitiva y en consecuencia de su sostenibilidad deben velar por el mejoramiento continuo en todos sus procesos y por hacer uso de aquellos conceptos, herramientas y modelos que las hagan más veloces que sus competidores, uno de estos conceptos es el de la Gestión del Conocimiento (GC) que básicamente se define como aquellos procesos que tienen como finalidad el de valorar los activos intangibles de la organización y buscan su mejoramiento continuo. El presente artículo de revisión analiza las diferentes aproximaciones realizadas por diversos autores en torno a la temática de la GC en cuanto a aspectos conceptuales, de caracterización y propuestas más elaboradas de modelos para implementación.spa
dc.descriptionAs organizações em busca constante de vantagem competitiva e conseqüentemente sua sustentabilidade devem assegurar a melhoria contínua em todos os seus processos e fazer uso desses conceitos, ferramentas e modelos que os tornem mais rápidos que seus concorrentes, um desses conceitos é o de Knowledge Management (KM) que é basicamente definido como aqueles que têm por objetivo valorizar os ativos intangíveis da organização e buscar sua melhoria contínua. Este artigo de revisão analisa as diferentes abordagens feitas por diferentes autores sobre o assunto CG em termos de aspectos conceituais, caracterização e propostas mais elaboradas para modelos de implementação.por
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.formattext/html
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherEscuela de Postgrados de la Fuerza Aérea Colombianaspa
dc.relationhttps://publicacionesfac.com/index.php/cienciaypoderaereo/article/view/578/733
dc.relationhttps://publicacionesfac.com/index.php/cienciaypoderaereo/article/view/578/750
dc.relation/*ref*/Baskervllle, R., & Dulipovici, A. (2006). The theoretical foundations of knowledge management. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 83-105. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.kmrp.8500090
dc.relation/*ref*/Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. (2001). Review: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS, 107-136. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250961
dc.relation/*ref*/Arnoníes, A., & Aldázabal, J. (2004). Propuesta para el cálculo del índice de memoria de inteligencia organizacional (IMIO).
dc.relation/*ref*/Bolloju, N., Khalifa, M., &Turban, E. (2002). Integrating knowledge management into enterprise environments for the next generation decision support. Decision Support Systems, 163-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9236(01)00142-7
dc.relation/*ref*/Briceño, M & Bernal , C. (2010). ESTUDIOS DE CASO SOBRE LA GESTIÓN DEL CONOCIMIENTO EN CUATRO ORGANIZACIONES COLOMBIANAS LÍDERES EN PENETRACIÓN DE MERCADO. Estudios Gerenciales, 173-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0123-5923(10)70140-6
dc.relation/*ref*/Cañibano, L, García, M., & Sánchez, P. (1999). La relevancia de los intangibles para la valoración y la gestión de empresas: Revisión de la literatura. Financiación y Contabilidad, 17-88.
dc.relation/*ref*/CEN. (2003). European Guide to Good Practice in Knowledge Management Chapter 7. CEN.
dc.relation/*ref*/Chauvel, D., & Despres, C. (2002). A Review of Survey research in knowledge Management. Journal of Knowledge Management, 207-223. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270210434322
dc.relation/*ref*/Cheng, S., Dai, R.,Xu,W.,&Shi, Y. (2006). RESEARCH ON DATA MINING AND KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT AND ITS APPLICATIONS IN CHINA'S ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: SIGNIFICANCE AND TREND. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 585-596. https://doi.org/10.1142/S021962200600226X
dc.relation/*ref*/Courtney, J. (2001). Decision making and knowledge management in inquiring organizations: toward a new decision-making paradigm for DSS. Decision Support Systems, 17-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9236(00)00117-2
dc.relation/*ref*/Dalkir, K. (2005). Knowledge Management in Theory and Practice. Burlington: ELSEVIER.
dc.relation/*ref*/Davidson, C, & Voss, P. (2002). Knowledge Management. Tandem Press: Auckland.
dc.relation/*ref*/Definición. De. (15 de Octubre de 2015). Definición. De. Obtenido de http://definicion.de/inforrnacion/
dc.relation/*ref*/Gartner. (2013). Gartner. Recuperado el 1 de Septiembre de 2015, de http://www.gartner.com/it-glossary/km-knowledge-management
dc.relation/*ref*/Guo, Z., & Sheffield, J. (2008). A paradigmatic and methodological examination of knowledge management research: 2000 to 2004. Decision Support Systems, 673-688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2007.09.006
dc.relation/*ref*/Jackson, C. (1999). Process to product: Creating tools for knowledge management. Texas.
dc.relation/*ref*/Karami, M., Alvan, M., Zare, H.,& Kheirandish,M. (2015). Determination of Critical Success Factors for Knowledge Management Implementation, Using Qualitative and Quantitative Tools (Case study: Bahman Automobile Industry). Iranian Journal of Management Studies, 181-201.
dc.relation/*ref*/Knowledge Management Cosmology. (1998).
dc.relation/*ref*/Kruger, C, & Snyman, M. (2007). Guidelines for assessing the knowledge management maturity of organizations. South African Journal of information management. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajim.v9i3.34
dc.relation/*ref*/Lee, M., & Chen,T. (2012). Revealing research themes and trends In knowledge management: From 1995 to 2010. Knowledge-Based Systems, 47-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2011.11.016
dc.relation/*ref*/Liao, S. (2003). Knowledge management technologies and applications. Expert Systems with Applications, 155-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0957-4174(03)00043-5
dc.relation/*ref*/Liberona, D., & Ruiz, M. (2013). Análisis de la ¡mplementación de programas de gestión del conocimientoen las empresas chilenas. Estudios Gerenciales, 151-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.estger.2013.05.003
dc.relation/*ref*/Liebowitz, J. (2001). Knowledge management and its link to artificial intelligence. Expert Systems with Applications, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0957-4174(00)00044-0
dc.relation/*ref*/Ma, Z., & Yu, K.-H. (2011). Research trends in knowledge management: Analyzing the past and predicting the future. Information Systems Management, 43-56. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2011.536112
dc.relation/*ref*/Maier, R., & Thalmann, S. (2010). Using personas for designing knowledge and learning services: results of an ethnographi-cally informed study. Technology Enhanced Learning. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTEL.2010.031260
dc.relation/*ref*/Manzanares, D., & Gómez, G. (2008). GESTIÓN DEL CONOCIMIENTO ORGANIZATIVO, INNOVACIÓN TECNOLÓGICA Y RESULTADOS. UNA INVESTIGACIÓN EMPÍRICA. Investigaciones Europeas de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa ,139-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1135-2523(12)60028-8
dc.relation/*ref*/Mekhilef, M., Kelleher, D., & Olesen, A. (30 de Junio de 2003). European Knowledge Management Glossary. European Guide to Good Practice in Knowledge Management Chapter 1 - Terminology. Brussels: cen isss.
dc.relation/*ref*/Montano, R., Liebowitz, J., Buchwalter, J., McCaw, D., Newman, B., & Rebeck, K. (2001). A systems thinking framework for knowledge management. Decision Support Systems, 5-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9236(00)00116-0
dc.relation/*ref*/National defence and the Canadian Armed Forces. (14 de 07 de 2008). Canadian Militar Journal. Recuperado el 20 de agosto de 2015, de http://www.journal.forces.gc.ca/vo4/no1/command-ordre-02-eng.asp
dc.relation/*ref*/Nonaka, I., &Takeuchi, H. (1995). La organización creadora de conocimiento: Cómo las compañías japonesas crean la dinámica de la innovación. California: Oxford.
dc.relation/*ref*/Pawlowsk, J., & Markus, B. (2012). The Global Knowledge Management Framework: Towards a Theory for Knowledge Management in Globally Distributed Settings. Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 92-100.
dc.relation/*ref*/Pina, R, Romao, M., & Oliveira, M. (2013). Using benefits management to link knowledge management to business objectives. Journal of information and knowledge management systems, 22-38. https://doi.org/10.1108/03055721311302124
dc.relation/*ref*/Plessis, M. (2007). Knowledge management: what makes complex implementations successful? Journal of Knowledge management, 91-101. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270710738942
dc.relation/*ref*/Polanyi, M. (1966). Te tacit dimension. Chicago.
dc.relation/*ref*/Real Academia Española. (27 de 10 de 2017). Diccionario de la lengua española. Obtenido de http://dle.rae.es/?id=LXrOgrN
dc.relation/*ref*/Research paradigms of contemporary knowledge management studies. (2010). Journal ofknowledge management, 175-189. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271011032337
dc.relation/*ref*/Ruggles, R. (1997). Knowledge management Tools. Boston: Elsevier.
dc.relation/*ref*/Serenko, A., Bontis, N., Booker, L, Sadeddin, K., & FHardie, T (2010). A scientometric analysis of knowledge management and intellectual capital academic literature. Journal of knowledge management, 3-23. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271011015534
dc.relation/*ref*/Solimán, R, & Spooner, K. (2000). Strategies for implementing knowledge management: role of human resources management. Journal of Knowledge Management, 337-345. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270010379894
dc.relation/*ref*/STEPS: a knowledge management maturity roadmap for corporate sustainability. (2006). Business Process Management Journal, 793-808. https://doi.org/10.1108/14637150610710936
dc.relation/*ref*/Teece, D. (1998). Research directions for knowledge management. California: SPRING. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165957
dc.relation/*ref*/Tyndale, P. (2000). The organisational knowledge development life cycle: from knowledge creation to knowledge application. Second European Conference on Knowledge Management: Bled School.
dc.relation/*ref*/Tyndale, P. (2002). A taxonomy of knowledge software tools: origins an d applications. Evaluation and program planning, 183-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-7189(02)00012-5
dc.relation/*ref*/Wallace, D., Van Fleet, C, & Downs, L. (2011). The research core of the knowledge management literature. International Journal of Information Management, 14-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2010.10.002
dc.relation/*ref*/Wensley, A. (2000). tools for knowledge management. Conference of knowledge management. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-7506-7247-4.50008-2
dc.relation/*ref*/Wiig, K. (1994). Knowledge management foundations: Thinking about thinking how people and organizations create and use knowledge. Schema Press.
dc.relation/*ref*/Ying , H., Geok, L, & Kankanhalli, A. (2006). Development and Application of a General Knowledge Management Maturity Model. Singapore.
dc.relation/*ref*/Yogesh, D., Venkitachalam, K., Sharif, A., Al-Karaghouli, W., & Weer-akkody, V. (2011). Research Trends in Knowledge Management: Analyzing the Past and Predicting the Future. Information Systems Management, 43-56. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2011.536112
dc.sourceCiencia y Poder Aéreo; Vol. 12 No. 1 (2017): Enero - Diciembre; 276-286eng
dc.sourceCiencia y Poder Aéreo; Vol. 12 Núm. 1 (2017): Enero - Diciembre; 276-286spa
dc.sourceCiencia y Poder Aéreo; v. 12 n. 1 (2017): Enero - Diciembre; 276-286por
dc.source2389-9468
dc.source1909-7050
dc.subjectKnowledgeeng
dc.subjectInformationeng
dc.subjectKnowledge Managementeng
dc.subjectIntellectual Capitaleng
dc.subjectIntangible Assetseng
dc.subjectValuation.eng
dc.subjectConocimientospa
dc.subjectinformaciónspa
dc.subjectgestión de conocimientospa
dc.subjectcapital intelectualspa
dc.subjectactivo intangiblespa
dc.subjectvaloración.spa
dc.subjectConhecimentopor
dc.subjectinformaçãopor
dc.subjectgestão do conhecimentopor
dc.subjectcapital intelectualpor
dc.subjectativos intangíveispor
dc.subjectavaliação.por
dc.titleKnowledge Management: Need or added value?eng
dc.titleGestión de conocimiento, ¿necesidad o valor agregado?spa
dc.titleGerenciamento de conhecimento, necessidade ou valor agregado?por
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record