Knowledge Management: Need or added value?
Gestión de conocimiento, ¿necesidad o valor agregado?;
Gerenciamento de conhecimento, necessidade ou valor agregado?
dc.creator | Muñoz Peña, Fernando Andrés | |
dc.date | 2017-12-06 | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T12:59:38Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-06-17T12:59:38Z | |
dc.identifier | https://publicacionesfac.com/index.php/cienciaypoderaereo/article/view/578 | |
dc.identifier | 10.18667/cienciaypoderaereo.578 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12963/266 | |
dc.description | In their constant quest for competitive advantage –and in consequence, of their sustainability, organizations should ensure continuous improvement in all their processes, concepts, tools and models to be faster than their competitors. One of these tools is Knowledge Management (KM), which is basically defined as those processes that aim to assess the intangible assets of an organization and help their search for continuous improvement. This review article discusses the different approaches taken by various authors around the theme of KM regarding conceptual and characterization aspects, as well as more elaborate proposals for model implementation. | eng |
dc.description | Las organizaciones en su constante búsqueda de la ventaja competitiva y en consecuencia de su sostenibilidad deben velar por el mejoramiento continuo en todos sus procesos y por hacer uso de aquellos conceptos, herramientas y modelos que las hagan más veloces que sus competidores, uno de estos conceptos es el de la Gestión del Conocimiento (GC) que básicamente se define como aquellos procesos que tienen como finalidad el de valorar los activos intangibles de la organización y buscan su mejoramiento continuo. El presente artículo de revisión analiza las diferentes aproximaciones realizadas por diversos autores en torno a la temática de la GC en cuanto a aspectos conceptuales, de caracterización y propuestas más elaboradas de modelos para implementación. | spa |
dc.description | As organizações em busca constante de vantagem competitiva e conseqüentemente sua sustentabilidade devem assegurar a melhoria contínua em todos os seus processos e fazer uso desses conceitos, ferramentas e modelos que os tornem mais rápidos que seus concorrentes, um desses conceitos é o de Knowledge Management (KM) que é basicamente definido como aqueles que têm por objetivo valorizar os ativos intangíveis da organização e buscar sua melhoria contínua. Este artigo de revisão analisa as diferentes abordagens feitas por diferentes autores sobre o assunto CG em termos de aspectos conceituais, caracterização e propostas mais elaboradas para modelos de implementação. | por |
dc.format | application/pdf | |
dc.format | text/html | |
dc.language | spa | |
dc.publisher | Escuela de Postgrados de la Fuerza Aérea Colombiana | spa |
dc.relation | https://publicacionesfac.com/index.php/cienciaypoderaereo/article/view/578/733 | |
dc.relation | https://publicacionesfac.com/index.php/cienciaypoderaereo/article/view/578/750 | |
dc.relation | /*ref*/Baskervllle, R., & Dulipovici, A. (2006). The theoretical foundations of knowledge management. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 83-105. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.kmrp.8500090 | |
dc.relation | /*ref*/Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. (2001). Review: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS, 107-136. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250961 | |
dc.relation | /*ref*/Arnoníes, A., & Aldázabal, J. (2004). Propuesta para el cálculo del índice de memoria de inteligencia organizacional (IMIO). | |
dc.relation | /*ref*/Bolloju, N., Khalifa, M., &Turban, E. (2002). Integrating knowledge management into enterprise environments for the next generation decision support. Decision Support Systems, 163-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9236(01)00142-7 | |
dc.relation | /*ref*/Briceño, M & Bernal , C. (2010). ESTUDIOS DE CASO SOBRE LA GESTIÓN DEL CONOCIMIENTO EN CUATRO ORGANIZACIONES COLOMBIANAS LÍDERES EN PENETRACIÓN DE MERCADO. Estudios Gerenciales, 173-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0123-5923(10)70140-6 | |
dc.relation | /*ref*/Cañibano, L, García, M., & Sánchez, P. (1999). La relevancia de los intangibles para la valoración y la gestión de empresas: Revisión de la literatura. Financiación y Contabilidad, 17-88. | |
dc.relation | /*ref*/CEN. (2003). European Guide to Good Practice in Knowledge Management Chapter 7. CEN. | |
dc.relation | /*ref*/Chauvel, D., & Despres, C. (2002). A Review of Survey research in knowledge Management. Journal of Knowledge Management, 207-223. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270210434322 | |
dc.relation | /*ref*/Cheng, S., Dai, R.,Xu,W.,&Shi, Y. (2006). RESEARCH ON DATA MINING AND KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT AND ITS APPLICATIONS IN CHINA'S ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: SIGNIFICANCE AND TREND. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 585-596. https://doi.org/10.1142/S021962200600226X | |
dc.relation | /*ref*/Courtney, J. (2001). Decision making and knowledge management in inquiring organizations: toward a new decision-making paradigm for DSS. Decision Support Systems, 17-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9236(00)00117-2 | |
dc.relation | /*ref*/Dalkir, K. (2005). Knowledge Management in Theory and Practice. Burlington: ELSEVIER. | |
dc.relation | /*ref*/Davidson, C, & Voss, P. (2002). Knowledge Management. Tandem Press: Auckland. | |
dc.relation | /*ref*/Definición. De. (15 de Octubre de 2015). Definición. De. Obtenido de http://definicion.de/inforrnacion/ | |
dc.relation | /*ref*/Gartner. (2013). Gartner. Recuperado el 1 de Septiembre de 2015, de http://www.gartner.com/it-glossary/km-knowledge-management | |
dc.relation | /*ref*/Guo, Z., & Sheffield, J. (2008). A paradigmatic and methodological examination of knowledge management research: 2000 to 2004. Decision Support Systems, 673-688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2007.09.006 | |
dc.relation | /*ref*/Jackson, C. (1999). Process to product: Creating tools for knowledge management. Texas. | |
dc.relation | /*ref*/Karami, M., Alvan, M., Zare, H.,& Kheirandish,M. (2015). Determination of Critical Success Factors for Knowledge Management Implementation, Using Qualitative and Quantitative Tools (Case study: Bahman Automobile Industry). Iranian Journal of Management Studies, 181-201. | |
dc.relation | /*ref*/Knowledge Management Cosmology. (1998). | |
dc.relation | /*ref*/Kruger, C, & Snyman, M. (2007). Guidelines for assessing the knowledge management maturity of organizations. South African Journal of information management. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajim.v9i3.34 | |
dc.relation | /*ref*/Lee, M., & Chen,T. (2012). Revealing research themes and trends In knowledge management: From 1995 to 2010. Knowledge-Based Systems, 47-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2011.11.016 | |
dc.relation | /*ref*/Liao, S. (2003). Knowledge management technologies and applications. Expert Systems with Applications, 155-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0957-4174(03)00043-5 | |
dc.relation | /*ref*/Liberona, D., & Ruiz, M. (2013). Análisis de la ¡mplementación de programas de gestión del conocimientoen las empresas chilenas. Estudios Gerenciales, 151-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.estger.2013.05.003 | |
dc.relation | /*ref*/Liebowitz, J. (2001). Knowledge management and its link to artificial intelligence. Expert Systems with Applications, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0957-4174(00)00044-0 | |
dc.relation | /*ref*/Ma, Z., & Yu, K.-H. (2011). Research trends in knowledge management: Analyzing the past and predicting the future. Information Systems Management, 43-56. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2011.536112 | |
dc.relation | /*ref*/Maier, R., & Thalmann, S. (2010). Using personas for designing knowledge and learning services: results of an ethnographi-cally informed study. Technology Enhanced Learning. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTEL.2010.031260 | |
dc.relation | /*ref*/Manzanares, D., & Gómez, G. (2008). GESTIÓN DEL CONOCIMIENTO ORGANIZATIVO, INNOVACIÓN TECNOLÓGICA Y RESULTADOS. UNA INVESTIGACIÓN EMPÍRICA. Investigaciones Europeas de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa ,139-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1135-2523(12)60028-8 | |
dc.relation | /*ref*/Mekhilef, M., Kelleher, D., & Olesen, A. (30 de Junio de 2003). European Knowledge Management Glossary. European Guide to Good Practice in Knowledge Management Chapter 1 - Terminology. Brussels: cen isss. | |
dc.relation | /*ref*/Montano, R., Liebowitz, J., Buchwalter, J., McCaw, D., Newman, B., & Rebeck, K. (2001). A systems thinking framework for knowledge management. Decision Support Systems, 5-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9236(00)00116-0 | |
dc.relation | /*ref*/National defence and the Canadian Armed Forces. (14 de 07 de 2008). Canadian Militar Journal. Recuperado el 20 de agosto de 2015, de http://www.journal.forces.gc.ca/vo4/no1/command-ordre-02-eng.asp | |
dc.relation | /*ref*/Nonaka, I., &Takeuchi, H. (1995). La organización creadora de conocimiento: Cómo las compañías japonesas crean la dinámica de la innovación. California: Oxford. | |
dc.relation | /*ref*/Pawlowsk, J., & Markus, B. (2012). The Global Knowledge Management Framework: Towards a Theory for Knowledge Management in Globally Distributed Settings. Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 92-100. | |
dc.relation | /*ref*/Pina, R, Romao, M., & Oliveira, M. (2013). Using benefits management to link knowledge management to business objectives. Journal of information and knowledge management systems, 22-38. https://doi.org/10.1108/03055721311302124 | |
dc.relation | /*ref*/Plessis, M. (2007). Knowledge management: what makes complex implementations successful? Journal of Knowledge management, 91-101. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270710738942 | |
dc.relation | /*ref*/Polanyi, M. (1966). Te tacit dimension. Chicago. | |
dc.relation | /*ref*/Real Academia Española. (27 de 10 de 2017). Diccionario de la lengua española. Obtenido de http://dle.rae.es/?id=LXrOgrN | |
dc.relation | /*ref*/Research paradigms of contemporary knowledge management studies. (2010). Journal ofknowledge management, 175-189. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271011032337 | |
dc.relation | /*ref*/Ruggles, R. (1997). Knowledge management Tools. Boston: Elsevier. | |
dc.relation | /*ref*/Serenko, A., Bontis, N., Booker, L, Sadeddin, K., & FHardie, T (2010). A scientometric analysis of knowledge management and intellectual capital academic literature. Journal of knowledge management, 3-23. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271011015534 | |
dc.relation | /*ref*/Solimán, R, & Spooner, K. (2000). Strategies for implementing knowledge management: role of human resources management. Journal of Knowledge Management, 337-345. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270010379894 | |
dc.relation | /*ref*/STEPS: a knowledge management maturity roadmap for corporate sustainability. (2006). Business Process Management Journal, 793-808. https://doi.org/10.1108/14637150610710936 | |
dc.relation | /*ref*/Teece, D. (1998). Research directions for knowledge management. California: SPRING. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165957 | |
dc.relation | /*ref*/Tyndale, P. (2000). The organisational knowledge development life cycle: from knowledge creation to knowledge application. Second European Conference on Knowledge Management: Bled School. | |
dc.relation | /*ref*/Tyndale, P. (2002). A taxonomy of knowledge software tools: origins an d applications. Evaluation and program planning, 183-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-7189(02)00012-5 | |
dc.relation | /*ref*/Wallace, D., Van Fleet, C, & Downs, L. (2011). The research core of the knowledge management literature. International Journal of Information Management, 14-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2010.10.002 | |
dc.relation | /*ref*/Wensley, A. (2000). tools for knowledge management. Conference of knowledge management. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-7506-7247-4.50008-2 | |
dc.relation | /*ref*/Wiig, K. (1994). Knowledge management foundations: Thinking about thinking how people and organizations create and use knowledge. Schema Press. | |
dc.relation | /*ref*/Ying , H., Geok, L, & Kankanhalli, A. (2006). Development and Application of a General Knowledge Management Maturity Model. Singapore. | |
dc.relation | /*ref*/Yogesh, D., Venkitachalam, K., Sharif, A., Al-Karaghouli, W., & Weer-akkody, V. (2011). Research Trends in Knowledge Management: Analyzing the Past and Predicting the Future. Information Systems Management, 43-56. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2011.536112 | |
dc.source | Ciencia y Poder Aéreo; Vol. 12 No. 1 (2017): Enero - Diciembre; 276-286 | eng |
dc.source | Ciencia y Poder Aéreo; Vol. 12 Núm. 1 (2017): Enero - Diciembre; 276-286 | spa |
dc.source | Ciencia y Poder Aéreo; v. 12 n. 1 (2017): Enero - Diciembre; 276-286 | por |
dc.source | 2389-9468 | |
dc.source | 1909-7050 | |
dc.subject | Knowledge | eng |
dc.subject | Information | eng |
dc.subject | Knowledge Management | eng |
dc.subject | Intellectual Capital | eng |
dc.subject | Intangible Assets | eng |
dc.subject | Valuation. | eng |
dc.subject | Conocimiento | spa |
dc.subject | información | spa |
dc.subject | gestión de conocimiento | spa |
dc.subject | capital intelectual | spa |
dc.subject | activo intangible | spa |
dc.subject | valoración. | spa |
dc.subject | Conhecimento | por |
dc.subject | informação | por |
dc.subject | gestão do conhecimento | por |
dc.subject | capital intelectual | por |
dc.subject | ativos intangíveis | por |
dc.subject | avaliação. | por |
dc.title | Knowledge Management: Need or added value? | eng |
dc.title | Gestión de conocimiento, ¿necesidad o valor agregado? | spa |
dc.title | Gerenciamento de conhecimento, necessidade ou valor agregado? | por |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
Files in this item
Files | Size | Format | View |
---|---|---|---|
There are no files associated with this item. |
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
-
Revista Ciencia y Poder Aéreo
Cosecha OJS